Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build: Merge xpack checkstyle config into core #33399

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2018

Conversation

nik9000
Copy link
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 commented Sep 4, 2018

Merges the xpack checkstyle_suppressions.xml file into the core
checkstyle_suppressions.xml file. We needed two files in the past
because we had two repositories. Now that we have one we can use just
one.

Merges the xpack checkstyle_suppressions.xml file into the core
checkstyle_suppressions.xml file. We needed two files in the past
because we had two repositories. Now that we have one we can use just
one.
@nik9000 nik9000 added review :Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure v7.0.0 v6.5.0 labels Sep 4, 2018
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra

Copy link
Member

@rjernst rjernst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@jasontedor jasontedor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list is so short, we could conceivably clean these up and remove the suppressions rather than moving them to core where they will be lost? At least then a major part of our codebase (x-pack) would be free of suppressions?

@nik9000
Copy link
Member Author

nik9000 commented Sep 5, 2018

This list is so short, we could conceivably clean these up and remove the suppressions rather than moving them to core where they will be lost?

I'll check.

@nik9000
Copy link
Member Author

nik9000 commented Sep 5, 2018

I'll check.

Done.

Copy link
Member

@jasontedor jasontedor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's awesome! LGTM.

@nik9000
Copy link
Member Author

nik9000 commented Sep 5, 2018

That's awesome! LGTM.

I am, indeed, awesome.

@nik9000
Copy link
Member Author

nik9000 commented Sep 5, 2018

Thanks for reviewing @rjernst and @jasontedor .

@nik9000 nik9000 merged commit 74b8798 into elastic:master Sep 5, 2018
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
* master:
  Fix deprecated setting specializations (elastic#33412)
  HLRC: split cluster request converters (elastic#33400)
  HLRC: Add ML get influencers API (elastic#33389)
  Add conditional token filter to elasticsearch (elastic#31958)
  Build: Merge xpack checkstyle config into core (elastic#33399)
  Disable IndexRecoveryIT.testRerouteRecovery.
  INGEST: Implement Drop Processor (elastic#32278)
  [ML] Add field stats to log structure finder (elastic#33351)
  Add interval response parameter to AutoDateInterval histogram (elastic#33254)
  MINOR+CORE: Remove Dead Methods ClusterService (elastic#33346)
nik9000 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
Solves all of the xpack line length suppressions and then merges the
remainder of the xpack checkstyle_suppressions.xml file into the core
checkstyle_suppressions.xml file. At this point that just means the
antlr generated files for sql.

It also adds an exclusion to the line length tests for javadocs that
are just a URL. We have one such javadoc and breaking up the line would
make the link difficult to use.
@mark-vieira mark-vieira added the Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team label Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team v6.5.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants