-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add create rollup job api to high level rest client #33521
Add create rollup job api to high level rest client #33521
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
@polyfractal I'm sorry to create a new pull request for this but that was really easier as I created new classes for request, response and configurations objects. I kept the parsing logic even though it's not strictly required for this API as it simplifies the unit tests and prepare the field for other Rollup APIs. |
This pull request adds the Create Rollup Job API to the high level REST client. It supersedes elastic#32703 and adds dedicated request/response objects so that it does not depend on server side components. Related elastic#29827
1c55364
to
f98ecf4
Compare
import static org.elasticsearch.client.RequestConverters.REQUEST_BODY_CONTENT_TYPE; | ||
import static org.elasticsearch.client.RequestConverters.createEntity; | ||
|
||
final class RollupRequestConverters { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
++ to a dedicated class for these Rollup converters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tlrx! Sorry for the delay on getting this reviewed, busy week :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but its huge. I cant really do any proper reviewing on the sheer number of classes moving over, so I have to trust that its sane. Even breaking it up will only get u about 2k for the POJOs and like 1k for the HLRC stuff. Still huge.
Great work on the validatable stuff tho.
* the accumulating validation errors | ||
* @param exception the {@link ValidationException} to add errors from | ||
*/ | ||
public final void addValidationErrors(final @Nullable ValidationException exception) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
excellent
|
||
private final boolean acknowledged; | ||
|
||
public PutRollupJobResponse(final boolean acknowledged) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Im ok with making a common response in client for the Ack Responses. We have a lot of them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, but the PR was already large enough. I think it must be done once another ack response is added to the HLRC.
Thanks @polyfractal and @hub-cap! I apologize for the size of the pull request; I tried to split it into multiple chunks (like I did to clean up the config objects) but did not succeed. |
final String cron = "*/1 * * * * ?"; | ||
final int pageSize = randomIntBetween(numDocs, numDocs * 10); | ||
// TODO expand this to also test with histogram and terms? | ||
final GroupConfig groups = new GroupConfig(new DateHistogramGroupConfig("date", DateHistogramInterval.DAY)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@polyfractal Do you think you could improve this test? I think I borrowed it from another place and I noticed that it did not cover everything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @polyfractal
Another attempt. Introduced in #33521
Another attempt. Introduced in #33521
This pull request adds the Create Rollup Job API to the high level REST client. It supersedes #32703 and adds dedicated request/response objects so that it does not depend on server side components.
Related #29827