Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Print out search request as part of async search task description #62057

Merged

Conversation

javanna
Copy link
Member

@javanna javanna commented Sep 7, 2020

Currently, the async search task is the task that will be running through the whole execution of an async search. While the submit async search task prints out the search as part of its description, async search task doesn't while it should.

With this commit we address that while also making sure that the description highlights that the task is originated from an async search.

Also, we streamline the way the description is printed out by SearchTask so that it does not get forgotten in the future.

Currently, the async search task is the task that will be running through the whole execution of an async search. While the submit async search task prints out the search as part of its description, async search task doesn't while it should.

With this commit we address that while also making sure that the description highlights that the task is originated from an async search.

Also, we streamline the way the description is printed out by SearchTask so that it does not get forgotten in the future.
@javanna javanna added >enhancement :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories v8.0.0 v7.10.0 labels Sep 7, 2020
@javanna javanna requested a review from jimczi September 7, 2020 13:08
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Search)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Search Meta label for search team label Sep 7, 2020
@javanna
Copy link
Member Author

javanna commented Sep 8, 2020

The current test failure will be addressed by #62080

Copy link
Contributor

@mayya-sharipova mayya-sharipova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@javanna Thanks, I had a look, and it LGTM

@javanna javanna merged commit 06c85d3 into elastic:master Sep 8, 2020
javanna added a commit to javanna/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
…astic#62057)

Currently, the async search task is the task that will be running through the whole execution of an async search. While the submit async search task prints out the search as part of its description, async search task doesn't while it should.

With this commit we address that while also making sure that the description highlights that the task is originated from an async search.

Also, we streamline the way the description is printed out by SearchTask so that it does not get forgotten in the future.
javanna added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
…2057)

Currently, the async search task is the task that will be running through the whole execution of an async search. While the submit async search task prints out the search as part of its description, async search task doesn't while it should.

With this commit we address that while also making sure that the description highlights that the task is originated from an async search.

Also, we streamline the way the description is printed out by SearchTask so that it does not get forgotten in the future.
javanna added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2020
This commit addresses a super minor misalignment with master, applying exactly the same change that was made as part of #62057, which was backported before point in time APIs were backported.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>enhancement :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories Team:Search Meta label for search team v7.10.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants