Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Balance ci groups #110711

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 22, 2021

Conversation

brianseeders
Copy link
Contributor

@brianseeders brianseeders commented Aug 31, 2021

Cuts 20-25min off overall build time.

@brianseeders brianseeders added Feature:CI Continuous integration release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v8.0.0 Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team labels Aug 31, 2021
@tylersmalley
Copy link
Contributor

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

⏳ Build in-progress, with failures

Failed CI Steps

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@brianseeders brianseeders changed the title Attempt to balance ci groups a little bit [CI] Balance ci groups Sep 22, 2021
@brianseeders brianseeders added v7.16.0 v7.15.1 v7.14.3 auto-backport Deprecated - use backport:version if exact versions are needed labels Sep 22, 2021
@brianseeders brianseeders marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2021 04:10
@brianseeders brianseeders requested review from a team as code owners September 22, 2021 04:10
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@brianseeders brianseeders requested a review from a team September 22, 2021 04:10
@brianseeders brianseeders enabled auto-merge (squash) September 22, 2021 04:12
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

1 similar comment
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

brianseeders added a commit to brianseeders/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
# Conflicts:
#	test/functional/apps/visualize/index.ts
brianseeders added a commit to brianseeders/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
# Conflicts:
#	test/functional/apps/visualize/index.ts
#	x-pack/test/functional/config.js
brianseeders added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
# Conflicts:
#	test/functional/apps/visualize/index.ts
#	x-pack/test/functional/config.js
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

1 similar comment
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

brianseeders added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2021
* [CI] Balance ci groups (#110711)

# Conflicts:
#	test/functional/apps/visualize/index.ts

* Update index.ts

* Update synthetics_integration.ts

Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

4 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

6 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@brianseeders brianseeders deleted the balance-ci-groups-202120831 branch October 18, 2021 14:50
@kibanamachine kibanamachine removed the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Oct 19, 2021
@mbondyra
Copy link
Contributor

mbondyra commented Nov 2, 2021

This PR is intentionally not backported to 7.16 because it broke some tests there. Just leaving this message after talking to Brian in case if anyone else wonders why it's not backported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport Deprecated - use backport:version if exact versions are needed Feature:CI Continuous integration release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v7.15.1 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants