Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport smaller state representation to 4.6 #8273

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2016

Conversation

spalger
Copy link
Contributor

@spalger spalger commented Sep 14, 2016

This is an attempt to backport the changes from #8022 to the 4.6 branch.

Closes #8262

@spalger spalger changed the title Backport smaller state representation to 4.6 [WIP] Backport smaller state representation to 4.6 Sep 14, 2016
@spalger spalger force-pushed the backport/4.6/smallerState branch from 52acd36 to 605769f Compare October 3, 2016 18:37
@epixa
Copy link
Contributor

epixa commented Oct 8, 2016

@spalger What's the status of this?

@spalger spalger force-pushed the backport/4.6/smallerState branch from 605769f to 7fbd389 Compare October 11, 2016 15:21
@spalger spalger changed the title [WIP] Backport smaller state representation to 4.6 Backport smaller state representation to 4.6 Oct 11, 2016
@cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@tylersmalley
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM - feature is available after enabling in advanced settings. All works as expected.

@epixa
Copy link
Contributor

epixa commented Oct 11, 2016

Two LGTMs, so I'm going to merge this.

@epixa epixa merged commit 2a44afd into elastic:4.6 Oct 11, 2016
spalger pushed a commit to spalger/kibana that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
With the addition of elastic#8273, the status page no longer loads because some dependencies are not mapped for partial bundles
@epixa epixa added v4.6.3 and removed v4.6.2 labels Oct 24, 2016
@epixa epixa added v4.7.0 and removed v4.6.3 labels Nov 16, 2016
@epixa epixa added the v4.6.4 label Dec 20, 2016
@spalger spalger deleted the backport/4.6/smallerState branch October 18, 2019 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants