-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
renaming teardown to close in plugins #3952
Comments
I don't think this should be a problem, personally I haven't seen a lot of code with a method named |
We can always push a new version of a plugin if it doesn't work. |
I agree with @ph it should be simple, but would not be less to do an small checkup. @ph doing that you say in your last comment imply there are test that check for this in the plugin, this is now the case of more plugins, but still not all. we should be careful with the ones we bundle with. what do you think? |
what I can do is have a new logstash checkout of the 2.0 snapshot and devultils and run:
this way at least we know specs run, before commiting |
I am OK with that @jsvd |
some plugins either failed or specs hanged, this was expected since some have shutdown related prs being reviewed |
Plugins that still have teardown calls/method definitions in them:
|
I will check the S3 output. |
Some plugins still use
teardown
, an api that will disappear in 2.0. These need to be renamed:Default plugins
Non default plugins
NOTE: these aren't a priority for now, can be done later
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: