-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add LICENSE #172
chore: add LICENSE #172
Conversation
Wheee, relicensing! The only license that makes sense is the same one used for all the other Electron projects, so I imagine making that licensing explicit will be as simple as getting a 👍 from the authors. I see this is marked as a WIP, but when this is ready for broader consumption it would make sense to flag not just Mark and Sam, but also Max, Kevin, Selwyn, et al to get affirmation. Edit: my mistake, I didn't notice that MIT was already listed in package.json. This PR seems to just be making it more explicit than before, not relicensing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nit, otherwise LGTM
Co-authored-by: Mark Lee <malept@users.noreply.github.com>
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.12.3 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
ref #164
Adds a
LICENSE
file to reflect the license indicated inpackage.json
.