Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add and prioritize the new "_matrix/integrations/v1" widget urls #2669

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2019

Conversation

jaywink
Copy link
Member

@jaywink jaywink commented Aug 26, 2019

As per MSC1961, add to the whitelisted integrations_widget_urls
the new paths. This allows us to switch Scalar over to use the
new path as default.

Note, the legacy "scalar-staging.riot.im" is these days just a redirect
to scalar-staging.vector.im, so there is no addition for that. It still
needs Riot side whitelisting though for existing widgets.

Refs: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#1961

As per MSC1961, add to the whitelisted integrations_widget_urls
the new paths. This allows us to switch Scalar over to use the
new path as default.

Note, the legacy "scalar-staging.riot.im" is these days just a redirect
to scalar-staging.vector.im, so there is no addition for that. It still
needs Riot side whitelisting though for existing widgets.

Refs: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#1961
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
@jaywink jaywink requested a review from manuroe August 26, 2019 08:51
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
Copy link
Member

@manuroe manuroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@manuroe manuroe merged commit b5818cd into develop Aug 26, 2019
@SBiOSoftWhare SBiOSoftWhare deleted the jaywink/integrations-widgets-urls branch June 2, 2020 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants