Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read receipts #379

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Nov 18, 2015
Merged

Read receipts #379

merged 21 commits into from
Nov 18, 2015

Conversation

dbkr
Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr commented Nov 16, 2015

No description provided.

@@ -529,7 +542,7 @@ module.exports = {
}

ret.unshift(
<li key={mxEv.getId()}><EventTile mxEvent={mxEv} continuation={continuation} last={last}/></li>
<li key={mxEv.getId()} ref={this._collectEventNode.bind(this, mxEv.getId())}><EventTile mxEvent={mxEv} continuation={continuation} last={last}/></li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like the same stuff we're doing in React SDK?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, trying to merge the same changes over to the duplicated controller in react sdk :(

@kegsay
Copy link
Contributor

kegsay commented Nov 16, 2015

LGTM though I can't really say much about the velocity stuff. The PR is too large for my poor brain to grok it fully. From what I can grok, it looks good though :D

…companying text (as with read receipts) they can be somewhat unhelpful. May as well have them all the time I think.
dbkr added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2015
@dbkr dbkr merged commit 1099892 into develop Nov 18, 2015
@t3chguy t3chguy deleted the read_receipts branch May 12, 2022 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants