Reintroduce #17291.

changelog.d/17291.misc

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Do not block event sending/receiving while calulating large event auth chains.

synapse/storage/controllers/persist_events.py

@@ -617,13 +617,25 @@ async def _persist_event_batch(
                         room_id, chunk
                     )
 
+            with Measure(self._clock, "calculate_chain_cover_index_for_events"):
+                # We now calculate chain ID/sequence numbers for any state events we're
+                # persisting. We ignore out of band memberships as we're not in the room
+                # and won't have their auth chain (we'll fix it up later if we join the
+                # room).
+                #
+                # See: docs/auth_chain_difference_algorithm.md
+                new_event_links = await self.persist_events_store.calculate_chain_cover_index_for_events(
+                    room_id, [e for e, _ in chunk]
+                )
+
             await self.persist_events_store._persist_events_and_state_updates(
                 room_id,
                 chunk,
                 state_delta_for_room=state_delta_for_room,
                 new_forward_extremities=new_forward_extremities,
                 use_negative_stream_ordering=backfilled,
                 inhibit_local_membership_updates=backfilled,
+                new_event_links=new_event_links,
             )
 
         return replaced_events

synapse/storage/databases/main/event_federation.py

@@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ def __init__(
             500000, "_event_auth_cache", size_callback=len
         )
 
+        # Flag used by unit tests to disable fallback when there is no chain cover
+        # index.
+        self.tests_allow_no_chain_cover_index = True
+
         self._clock.looping_call(self._get_stats_for_federation_staging, 30 * 1000)
 
         if isinstance(self.database_engine, PostgresEngine):
@@ -220,8 +224,10 @@ async def get_auth_chain_ids(
                 )
             except _NoChainCoverIndex:
                 # For whatever reason we don't actually have a chain cover index
-                # for the events in question, so we fall back to the old method.
-                pass
+                # for the events in question, so we fall back to the old method
+                # (except in tests)
+                if not self.tests_allow_no_chain_cover_index:
+                    raise
 
         return await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
             "get_auth_chain_ids",
@@ -271,7 +277,7 @@ def _get_auth_chain_ids_using_cover_index_txn(
         if events_missing_chain_info:
             # This can happen due to e.g. downgrade/upgrade of the server. We
             # raise an exception and fall back to the previous algorithm.
-            logger.info(
+            logger.error(
                 "Unexpectedly found that events don't have chain IDs in room %s: %s",
                 room_id,
                 events_missing_chain_info,
@@ -482,8 +488,10 @@ async def get_auth_chain_difference(
                 )
             except _NoChainCoverIndex:
                 # For whatever reason we don't actually have a chain cover index
-                # for the events in question, so we fall back to the old method.
-                pass
+                # for the events in question, so we fall back to the old method
+                # (except in tests)
+                if not self.tests_allow_no_chain_cover_index:
+                    raise
 
         return await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
             "get_auth_chain_difference",
@@ -710,7 +718,7 @@ def _fixup_auth_chain_difference_sets(
         if events_missing_chain_info - event_to_auth_ids.keys():
             # Uh oh, we somehow haven't correctly done the chain cover index,
             # bail and fall back to the old method.
-            logger.info(
+            logger.error(
                 "Unexpectedly found that events don't have chain IDs in room %s: %s",
                 room_id,
                 events_missing_chain_info - event_to_auth_ids.keys(),