Add function call syntax #15
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CaiqueMitsuoka
changed the title
|
@axelson can you merge this, please? |
axelson
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add the pattern to scope the function calls with parenthesis or dot/parenthesis and for
Module.functioni.e. any non ambiguous function call.Allowing themes to change the color of them.
I've also added to Sublime and there you can find more of the reason behind it.
TL;DR We as community avoid ambiguous calls with the compilation warning and the formatter, so we should support this approach .
I've been using for some months now and has been a great experience.