feat(queries): Update Zig highlights scm

[sbancuz]

Got these from nvim-treesitter

• https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter

[sbancuz]

@jcs090218 can you look at this pr? Zig current highlights don't work with the new versions of the language. Also this may also close #624

EDIT: I also tried to update to the new upstream version https://github.com/tree-sitter-grammars/tree-sitter-zig with the updated highlights from neovim but i couldn't manage to compile it correctly. Kept getting ABI version mismatch for some reason and scripts/compile zig didn't generate the new grammar. I could make the new commit but I'd have no way of knowing if it actually worked or not.

[jcs090218]

Can you try to see if it works on your side? I'm pretty sure I got it from the nvim repo a while ago. 🤔

[sbancuz]

I'm not too sure what do you mean, but I can confirm that the highlights in my commit do work. They are not the best though. The old ones don't. Some keywords are not being highlighted

If you want I can retry with the new upstream repo so this pr kill two birds with one stone, but I'm not sure on how to resolve the issues I'm having

[jcs090218]

Sorry for the late reply! I have been really busy recently!

I got the queries from the nvim repo, but there were errors so we couldn't use it directly. 🤔

EDIT: I also tried to update to the new upstream version https://github.com/tree-sitter-grammars/tree-sitter-zig with the updated highlights from neovim but i couldn't manage to compile it correctly. Kept getting ABI version mismatch for some reason and scripts/compile zig didn't generate the new grammar. I could make the new commit but I'd have no way of knowing if it actually worked or not.

If the CI passed, then it should be good! 👍 You can try to compile it locally or open a PR with the updated upstream!

[sbancuz]

@jcs090218 I had to fight a bit with git submodules but in theory the CI should pass, I enabled it in my fork and it ran without any problems. This has the new repo and new-er highlights than the one from before. Although I didn't manage to test it on my machine since I kept getting the same problem of ABI incompatibility.

[sbancuz]

Don't run the CI again because I think I saw some of the tests failing and not just because of gpr. Somehow on macos it failed on everything.

EDIT: also when it's ready I will squash the commits if you need it

[jcs090218]

Just let me know if you need a re-run! :)

[sbancuz]

Ok my CI worked, so it should be all good I hope.

[jcs090218]

Thank you for your hard work! 🚀