Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advance RFC #0776 "Author built-in blueprints in Typescript" to Stage Ready for Release #873

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

emberjs-rfcs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot commented Nov 28, 2022

Advance #776 to the Ready For Release Stage

Summary

This pull request is advancing the RFC to the Ready For Release Stage.

An FCP is required before merging this PR to advance.

Upon merging this PR, automation will open a draft PR for this RFC to move to the Released Stage.

Ready for Release Stage Description

This stage is complete when the implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, and is in harmony with any changes in Ember that have occurred since the RFC was first written. This includes any necessary learning materials. At this stage, features or deprecations may be available for use behind a feature flag, or with an optional package, etc.

For codebase changes, there are no open questions that are anticipated to require breaking changes; the Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature.

This stage should include a list of criteria for determining when the proposal can be considered Recommended after being Released.

An FCP is required to move into this stage.

Each Ember core team will be requested as a reviewer on the PR to move into this stage. A representative of each team adds a review. If a team does not respond to the request, and after the conclusion of the FCP, it is assumed that the release may proceed.

Checklist to move to Ready for Release

  • Implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, with any adjustments noted in the RFC
  • Any necessary learning materials have been updated
  • The Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature
  • Criteria for moving to the Recommended Stage has been filled out
  • This PR has been converted from a draft to a regular PR and the Final Comment Period label has been added to start the FCP
  • Each team has been added as a reviewer to the PR at the start of the FCP
    • Framework @emberjs/framework
    • Data @emberjs/ember-data-core
    • CLI @emberjs/cli
    • Learning @emberjs/learning-core
    • Typescript @emberjs/typescript-core
    • Steering @emberjs/steering

Criteria for moving to Recommended (required)

A set of criteria for moving this RFC to the Recommended Stage, following release:

Track Implementation

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot added RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage labels Nov 28, 2022
@kategengler kategengler changed the title Advance RFC #0776 to Stage Ready for Release Advance RFC #0776 "Author built-in blueprints in Typescript" to Stage Ready for Release Feb 1, 2023
@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member

We should still update this part of the guides according to:
https://github.com/cafreeman/rfcs/blob/typescript-blueprints/text/0776-typescript-blueprints.md#how-we-teach-this

We should also make sure to release emberjs/ember.js#20361, which makes sure people can generate routes when having a router.ts file.

@wagenet wagenet marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2023 19:41
@wagenet
Copy link
Member

wagenet commented Mar 13, 2023

Normally this should have gone through an FCP. However, it has already been released as part of 4.9.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants