Chore: update ESLint

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source)	7.7.1 -> 7.10.0
@typescript-eslint/parser (source)	7.7.1 -> 7.10.0
eslint-plugin-jest	28.2.0 -> 28.5.0
eslint-plugin-jsdoc	48.2.3 -> 48.2.6

---

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v7.10.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features

• eslint-plugin: [sort-type-constituents] support case sensitive sorting

🩹 Fixes

• eslint-plugin: [prefer-regexp-exec] fix heuristic to check whether regex may contain global flag

❤️ Thank You

• auvred
• Emanuel Hoogeveen
• jsfm01
• Kirk Waiblinger

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.9.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes

• eslint-plugin: [explicit-function-return-types] fix false positive on default parameters

❤️ Thank You

• Kirk Waiblinger
• Sheetal Nandi
• Vinccool96

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.8.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes

• eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-argument] handle tagged templates

• eslint-plugin: [prefer-optional-chain] suggests optional chaining during strict null equality check

• eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-assertions] handle tagged templates

• eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-return] handle union types

• eslint-plugin: [no-unused-vars] clear error report range

❤️ Thank You

• auvred
• Josh Goldberg ✨
• jsfm01
• Kim Sang Du
• YeonJuan

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v7.10.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.9.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.8.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest (eslint-plugin-jest)

v28.5.0

Compare Source

Features

• allow @typescript-eslint/utils v7 as a direct dependency (#​1567) (1476f10)

v28.4.0

Compare Source

Features

• valid-expect: supporting automatically fixing missing await in some cases (#​1574) (a407098)

v28.3.0

Compare Source

Features

• prefer importing jest globals for specific types (#​1568) (c464ae3)

gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc (eslint-plugin-jsdoc)

v48.2.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• require-yields: avoid error when ExportNamedDeclaration has no declaration prop (93a9415)

v48.2.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• handle deprecated typeParameters (#​1229) (d417d05)

v48.2.4

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on the 27th day of the month" in timezone America/Los_Angeles, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[github-actions]

🧪 Branch testing instructions

This pull request can be tested locally with the following command:

npm exec --yes -- "github:emmercm/igir#renovate/eslint" [commands..] [options]

Comment generated by the Pull Request Commenter workflow.

[renovate]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.25%. Comparing base (7dc8e97) to head (e2e7f61).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1140   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.25%   93.25%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines        6347     6347           
  Branches     1509     1509           
=======================================
  Hits         5919     5919           
  Misses        427      427           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

🔒 Inactive pull request lock

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

Comment generated by the GitHub Lock Issues workflow.