-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 753
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Server lifecycle #1497
Open
bwhmather
wants to merge
8
commits into
encode:master
Choose a base branch
from
bwhmather:server-lifecycle
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Server lifecycle #1497
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
44665e7
Initial implementations of close and wait_closed
bwhmather 2cd9456
Introduce start_serving method
bwhmather bf87795
Stop waiting for startup or shutdown if server aborts
bwhmather 4026144
Remove shutdown event in favour of just awaiting the main task
bwhmather 2c17123
Make it possible to pass list of sockets into the constructor
bwhmather 118213c
Properly wait for server startup and shutdown in tests
bwhmather 42ed574
Defer constructing startup event until we are definitely in event loop
bwhmather 79adcdd
Fix clobbering of sockets list from constructor
bwhmather File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's worth pointing this bit out as it suffers from all of the same problems that our test fixtures have suffered from:
asyncio.sleep(0.1)
instead of checking for startup properly.server.shutdown()
not actually killing the server main loop.I think it's a good demonstration of my motivation for proposing these changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep pretty interesting, unfortunate I cant dedicate more time on this, the only real "interrogation" I have it the interaction it may have with --reload and --workers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can tell, there shouldn't be any interaction. Both just call
server.run
in a subprocess and kill the process by sending the appropriate signal. There doesn't appear to be much difference from running without multiple workers or a watcher, which is as it should be.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
going to play with this but re-reading it I like it,
@florimondmanca what are your thoughts on this, you extensively played with this a while ago, your input should be very interesting