Logstash and Kibana

[mattgagliardi]

Elasticsearch is already present in endoflife.date, I'd really like to see Logstash and Kibana as well. I'm really not much of a coder (like at all) but would be willing to take a shot at modifying the elasticsearch.md as appropriate to pull in the other two. Is that kind of thing considered acceptable?

[captn3m0]

I would suggest separate pages, since the versioning scheme is quite different.

Do see the pinned issue for getting start with contributions.

[mattgagliardi]

Oh, I'm sorry... poor choice of words on my part. What I meant was using the elasticsearch.md as a "template" and adjusting as appropriate. As in not starting from a completely blank sheet of paper. It feels a little bit like plagarizing but probably the best I could do.
So yes, separate pages...but based very very very heavily off the existing elasticsearch.md.

[captn3m0]

Yup, that sounds good 👍🏽. It's not plagiarizing at all :)

[marcwrobel]

FYI those products are part of the "Elastic Suite" and share the same version (for instance https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/welcome-to-elastic/7.17/new.html, https://www.elastic.co/blog/elastic-stack-7-17-7-released). So when the Elastic Suite 7.17.7 is released, it means there is a versions 7.17.7 for each product :

• https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/releases/tag/v7.17.7
• https://github.com/elastic/kibana/releases/tag/v7.17.7
• https://github.com/elastic/logstash/releases/tag/v7.17.7
• https://github.com/elastic/beats/releases/tag/v7.17.7
• ...

In this case I think it would be simpler to have only one page for the entire suite instead of one page by product.

[captn3m0]

Makes sense 👍🏽 .