You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several years ago there were many requests for Meza to work on Debian. I put in a fair amount of work getting it working, and then got minimal further interest.
Meza does a lot. Without significant contribution from others I don't think it's sustainable to support multiple OSes. My inclination is to drop support for Debian.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree and think that anyone interested in contributing to meza in order
to achieve Debian support should be able to pull a lot of what is needed
from Freephile's 34.x "qb" fork of meza. That said, we should always seek
to place the centos/rhel-centric content in dedicated centos/rhel-dedicated
task files so that the main tasks contain the distro-check logic. Does that
make sense?
Several years ago there were many requests for Meza to work on Debian. I put in a fair amount of work getting it working, and then got minimal further interest.
Meza does a lot. Without significant contribution from others I don't think it's sustainable to support multiple OSes. My inclination is to drop support for Debian.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: