-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
oauth2: set accept header on access_token request #14538
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4d9fa70
Fix OAuth2 client not setting accept header
riptl 7dc4095
Safer OAuth2 token request header test
riptl d09c10e
oauth2: comment explaining why we set Accept header
riptl 9f718ed
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into oauth2-accept-json
riptl 8143105
check for access_token req content type header
riptl 1104afa
check for access token request method
riptl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm do we want to make this configurable but on by default?
cc: @williamsfu99
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc: @jparise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a note, the current client expects (to accept/parse) JSON payload from the server:
envoy/source/extensions/filters/http/oauth2/oauth_client.cc
Line 81 in 4d9fa70
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rgs1 If Envoy is aiming for strict RFC 6749 compliance, I don't think it needs to be configurable. I'm not aware of a version of the OAuth 2.0 standard that allows
FormUrlEncoded
access token responses but I don't have much experience with OAuth to be honest.https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.4 states:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-5.1 states:
I just noticed this also means Envoy's code was never really wrong to begin with. It's reasonable to expect a JSON response if the RFC says so, but of course setting the Accept header is nicer. GitHub just happened to violate the RFC by defaulting to
FormUrlEncoded
instead of JSON.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks for the reply. Mind adding a summary of the above with those links into the code as a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rgs1 Done