-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[EasyWebhook] Add WebhookRequestFailedException #1465
[EasyWebhook] Add WebhookRequestFailedException #1465
Conversation
Code Review in Space: https://eonx.jetbrains.space/p/support/reviews/497/timeline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome job! 😎 Code review passed.
Secure code in this PR has been written to best practice standards and covers the following as a minimum. Please ticket if coded this way (also tick if not relevant to this code change):
- Protect from Injection attacks
- Protect data with proper input validation, and protect against buffer overflows, pointers/shared data
- Protect with appropriate encryption and cryptography (E.g. Appropriate hashing, symmetric encryption used, ciphers) if applicable
- Protect against XSS and CSRF
- Ensure that pages, data access etc, are written with appropriate access control authorisation and authentication requirements
- Ensure all important errors and business logic cases are handled
- Ensure forwards and redirects are handled
- Ensure no sensitive data is exposed and appropriate logging in place as required
See procedure for more details: PROC-010 Secure Coding Practices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ERuban. Code review approved. Nice work!
Secure code in this PR has been written to best practice standards and covers the following as a minimum. Please ticket if coded this way (also tick if not relevant to this code change):
- Protect from Injection attacks
- Protect data with proper input validation, and protect against buffer overflows, pointers/shared data
- Protect with appropriate encryption and cryptography (E.g. Appropriate hashing, symmetric encryption used, ciphers) if applicable
- Protect against XSS and CSRF
- Ensure that pages, data access etc, are written with appropriate access control authorisation and authentication requirements
- Ensure all important errors and business logic cases are handled
- Ensure forwards and redirects are handled
- Ensure no sensitive data is exposed and appropriate logging in place as required
See procedure for more details: PROC-010 Secure Coding Practices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Secure code in this PR has been written to best practice standards and covers the following as a minimum. Please ticket if coded this way (also tick if not relevant to this code change):
- Protect from Injection attacks
- Protect data with proper input validation, and protect against buffer overflows, pointers/shared data
- Protect with appropriate encryption and cryptography (E.g. Appropriate hashing, symmetric encryption used, ciphers) if applicable
- Protect against XSS and CSRF
- Ensure that pages, data access etc, are written with appropriate access control authorisation and authentication requirements
- Ensure all important errors and business logic cases are handled
- Ensure forwards and redirects are handled
- Ensure no sensitive data is exposed and appropriate logging in place as required
See procedure for more details: PROC-010 Secure Coding Practices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👏👌🌟
Secure code in this PR has been written to best practice standards and covers the following as a minimum. Please ticket if coded this way (also tick if not relevant to this code change):
- Protect from Injection attacks
- Protect data with proper input validation, and protect against buffer overflows, pointers/shared data
- Protect with appropriate encryption and cryptography (E.g. Appropriate hashing, symmetric encryption used, ciphers) if applicable
- Protect against XSS and CSRF
- Ensure that pages, data access etc, are written with appropriate access control authorisation and authentication requirements
- Ensure all important errors and business logic cases are handled
- Ensure forwards and redirects are handled
- Ensure no sensitive data is exposed and appropriate logging in place as required
See procedure for more details: PROC-010 Secure Coding Practices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job! Code review complete.
Secure code in this PR has been written to best practice standards and covers the following as a minimum. Please ticket if coded this way (also tick if not relevant to this code change):
- Protect from Injection attacks
- Protect data with proper input validation, and protect against buffer overflows, pointers/shared data
- Protect with appropriate encryption and cryptography (E.g. Appropriate hashing, symmetric encryption used, ciphers) if applicable
- Protect against XSS and CSRF
- Ensure that pages, data access etc, are written with appropriate access control authorisation and authentication requirements
- Ensure all important errors and business logic cases are handled
- Ensure forwards and redirects are handled
- Ensure no sensitive data is exposed and appropriate logging in place as required
See procedure for more details: PROC-010 Secure Coding Practices
We can add this exception to ignored exceptions list for the Bugsnag then in example