Fix restart weights

[andreas-el]

Will add tests when implementation is approved

Issue
Resolves #8491

Screen.Recording.2024-08-23.at.10.26.13.mov

(dev-ert) ➜  33344772-5472-418d-82f2-68eda6eb39af git:(fix_restart_weights) ✗ cat metadata.json
{"weights": "5, 3, 2"}%

• PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
• Added appropriate release note label
• Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
• Make sure tests pass locally (after every commit!)

When applicable

• When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
• New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
• Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
• Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
• Bug fix: Create Backport PR to latest release

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.78%. Comparing base (31d3aa2) to head (ccea4be).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...gui/simulation/multiple_data_assimilation_panel.py	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8559      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.76%   90.78%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       20935    20941       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        19001    19011      +10     
+ Misses       1934     1930       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
gui-tests	75.85% <96.66%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
integration-tests	53.99% <23.33%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
unit-tests	68.78% <23.33%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[eivindjahren]

Looks good, but I would like to double check with @dafeda about this change :)

[dafeda]

Looks good, but I would like to double check with @dafeda about this change :)

This makes good sense to me 👍

[eivindjahren]

👍

[eivindjahren]

👍