Feasibility study around existing infrastructure and design ideas for the 7 North Hotel, incorporating modern design with traditional local architecture.
Since no two areas are alike, the main idea for the feasibility study is to find stations that are most similar to Bryn Mawr based on: 1) given distance from highways, hospitals, universities, and large employers and 2) population density and per capita income within the same or similar radius.
- College attendance ✅
- Rail Traffic ✅
- Pedestrian Traffic - inference
- Car Traffic - traffic along Lancaster Ave. and Bryn Mawr Ave. ✅
- Bus Traffic ✅
- Employee counts, major businesses - inference
- Employee counts, small businesses - inference
- PHL airport distance, air traffic, and ridership
Micro benefits:
- Existing traffic, hospital, theater, and colleges provide a natural market for project
- Resort-qualities bring in medium- to high-net worth clientele for a relatively affordable resort experience
- Is both enhanced by local tourism and enhances regional/national tourism
Macro benefits:
- Re-establishes town as a center of commerce, education, and tourism given surroundings
- Encourages increased usage of Paoli-Thorndale line
- Social image of a town must include lodging alternatives
Challenges
- Amtrak lien
- Cost of underground parking
- 200 spaces temporarily lost during construction (see forcing points below)
Study Challenges
- Comparing data across metro services, boarding vs. total vs. unique - Boarding seems to be most readily available and should give a number close to unique trips.
- Exact comparisons difficult - Note this in final draft including steps for best practices.
- Comparing town names can be confusing - Use radius out from local train station to determine proximity of features.
- Ticket prices can greatly affect daily traffic to local stops, but may be unlikely to affect the propensity of one to actual hotel visits given an upscale hotel.
Forcing Points - Forcing points should be considered as time contraints rather than actual threats. Most of them represent economic growth in the long-run, and will thereby benefit feasibility and profit for our project. In the short-run, however, they represent constraints that could possibly enter the landscape in the near future. So acting on this project before action is taken on other projects will be greatly beneficial to all interested parties. Some have large implications, some have much smaller, if any, implications. The point of this section is to consider all forcing points, regardless of size or impact.
- Substitute parking situation should be implemented, utilized, and completed before construction of possible 2, 6, and 10 S. Bryn Mawr Avenue Project. In other words, the underground parking lot meant to replace Lot 7 should be operational before the mixed use project on the opposite corner begins, since that is the last remaining large source of parking overflow for existing Lot 7 Users.
- Ardmore Hotel possibility - competition during the critical first years of operation
- College closure situation (e.g. Cabrini and other metro-area schools such as Art Institute of Philadelphia)
- Possibility of adverse height restrictions, similar to recent restrictions implemented in Ardmore
- Inevitable building downturn could cause funding to dry up, at least for a long business cycle
- Alternative development on Municipal Lot 7
- Increase or decrease of Harcum attendence - While a decrease could result in possible closure (see above), an increase could mean less parking spaces available for overflow during construction and Lot 7 closure
- Norristown Speed Line reopens County Line stop after improvement, opening possibility of more access to Villanova from competing hotel
- Wyndam House in Bryn Mawr College reopens, providing increased competition, although small, for the local lodging market
- Amtrak substation improvement slightly decreases local parking - BEGAN NOV. 2024
- Continued unimpeded growth in Valley Forge/King of Prussia area, in particular, a glut of new hotel and conference space
Further research:
- 30th Street Station Improvements
- Possible Philadelphia 76ers Market East project (Jefferson Station)
- Line extension to Coatesville
- New Norristown speed line KOP station
- County Line Station improvements and reopening
Possible Partnerships - representing large organizations that may be interested in employee or executive packages for corporate retreats or employee lodging during travel
Step 1: Read and interpret studies of a similar nature, preferably for hotels inside of town centers, if not available, do similar projects ( 1 week ) Step 2: Decide on a good group of test results similar to Lower Merion Township from Step 1. Based on this, some similar areas are Westfield, NJ, Princeton, NJ, Arlington, VA, Evanston, IL, Bethesda, MD, and Chapel Hill, NC. Focus is on train stops/village centers and the radius around them, not necessarily the town or city designation of the addresses. All raw data extracted for Lower Merion Township should be extracted from test markets in as comparable form as possible. Conduct as synchonous as possible duplicate studies for the test markets. ( 1 week ). New approach: inputs: college students, hospital beds, local businesses, car traffic, train station traffic output: stations most similar to Bryn Mawr analysis: hotel rooms in output towns Step 3: Examining test results and all possible metrics with closest possible comparisons.
Definitely: "old and the new"- outside (old) existing architectural styles of historic Main Line structures, inside (new) -modern, Asian-influenced, feng shui, modern Tokyo, Bangkok, Seoul structures, minimalist, practical terrace idea elevator top floor
Maybe: conical or octagon roof at beveled corners
Maybe not: arched fiberglass walks