Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Use TimeKeeper instead of SlowTestCollector in Subscriber\TestPreparedSubscriber #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2021

Conversation

localheinz
Copy link
Member

This pull request

  • uses the TimeKeeper instead of the SlowTestCollector in the Subscriber\TestPreparedSubscriber

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #25 (dd5672d) into main (2289f1a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #25   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        38        38           
===========================================
  Files             10        10           
  Lines            140       141    +1     
===========================================
+ Hits             140       141    +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Subscriber/TestPreparedSubscriber.php 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 2.00 <1.00> (ø)
src/SlowTestCollector.php 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 6.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2289f1a...dd5672d. Read the comment docs.

@ergebnis-bot ergebnis-bot self-assigned this Jan 24, 2021
@ergebnis-bot ergebnis-bot merged commit 879305b into main Jan 24, 2021
@ergebnis-bot ergebnis-bot deleted the feature/time-keeper branch January 24, 2021 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants