Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Use TimeKeeper and Collector\Collector instead of SlowTestCollector in Subscriber\TestPassedSubscriber #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2021

Conversation

localheinz
Copy link
Member

This pull request

  • uses TimeKeeper and Collector\Collector instead of SlowTestCollector in Subscriber\TestPassedSubscriber`

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #26 (efe1215) into main (879305b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #26   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
- Complexity        38        39    +1     
===========================================
  Files             10        10           
  Lines            140       149    +9     
===========================================
+ Hits             140       149    +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Subscriber/TestPassedSubscriber.php 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 3.00 <1.00> (+1.00)
src/SlowTestCollector.php 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 6.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 879305b...efe1215. Read the comment docs.

…stCollector in Subscriber\TestPassedSubscriber
@ergebnis-bot ergebnis-bot merged commit 8a8344b into main Jan 24, 2021
@ergebnis-bot ergebnis-bot deleted the feature/time-keeper branch January 24, 2021 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants