Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #1969 #1970

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2022
Merged

fix #1969 #1970

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2022

Conversation

slingamn
Copy link
Member

On a 32-bit architecture, 64-bit atomic loads and stores must be aligned to a
64-bit boundary. Since the (mysql.MySQL) struct is directly included in the
Server struct, it is impossible to guarantee this via the standard technique
of putting the 64-bit value at the beginning of the struct definition
(since the point at which it is included in the parent struct may cross a
64-bit boundary).

This optimization is probably pointless anyway, adding an additional
indirection won't make a difference.

On a 32-bit architecture, 64-bit atomic loads and stores must be aligned to a
64-bit boundary. Since the (mysql.MySQL) struct is directly included in the
Server struct, it is impossible to guarantee this via the standard technique
of putting the 64-bit value at the beginning of the struct definition
(since the point at which it is included in the parent struct may cross a
64-bit boundary).

This optimization is probably pointless anyway, adding an additional
indirection won't make a difference.
@slingamn slingamn merged commit c0e7aac into master Jun 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant