Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Txpool 4844 upgrades Part 2 #8213
Txpool 4844 upgrades Part 2 #8213
Changes from 29 commits
9be9769
14d105c
e020355
32453f4
501bba3
21968b7
b4abf8e
394f803
5d54999
a5912a5
426fd85
7e976b8
63c643e
b5219ec
782b48b
a9a518e
3b7a58c
6b834c9
f9b1295
0cc86e7
74bf8cc
c75e6ec
32dfc01
36fba72
3e53c4b
69bc185
0f6a49c
b19e700
78069b7
1384b4e
5ca568b
a8adb06
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are sending pending rather than current blobFee, it makes sense to do the same for baseFee (pending instead of current).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, i will make that change as well. Meanwhile, in this case we are sending values (to txPool) with respect to the CurrentBlock, which is where the sync is at. Should we consider sending values for the canonical head instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This piece of code looks like a kludge. I'd leave
currentBlock
as is since it seems to be doing the job.