Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

Updates connecting to Elixir example in README. #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2017

Conversation

tmr08c
Copy link
Contributor

@tmr08c tmr08c commented Apr 1, 2017

Updates how to run erlangpl in the "connecting to an Elixir iex session" section.

Updates how to run `erlangpl` in the "connecting to an Elixir iex session" section.
@michalslaski michalslaski merged commit bc2430b into erlanglab:master Apr 1, 2017
@michalslaski
Copy link
Member

Hi @tmr08c, thanks a lot for contributing! Did you find the tool useful?

@tmr08c tmr08c deleted the patch-1 branch April 4, 2017 02:13
@tmr08c
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmr08c commented Apr 4, 2017

My pleasure! After watching your talk I was excited to give this a try. We run on a single node and, as demoed during your EEF17 talk, the view logic for the traffic within a single node was a bit buggy.

I don't know if it's possible but it would be nice to be able to click on a process in the traffic view to get information about it like in the supervisor tree node. When I look now I see a bunch of PIDs and don't seem to be able to learn anything more about them.

screen shot 2017-04-03 at 10 21 48 pm

Thank you for all the work you all have done on this, this is already really impressive and I'm excited to see where it goes from here.

@baransu
Copy link
Contributor

baransu commented Apr 4, 2017

We have plans to provide some useful informations after clicking on process but it require some time. We're thinking about implementing flame graph vizualization like efame, and probably similar info like in supervision tree.

View is little buggy because of new processes being spawned and old processed being killed. @michalslaski had some idea how to fix that and it's on our todo list :)

Thank a lot for your feedback!!! 😃

@baransu baransu added this to the 0.6 milestone Apr 6, 2017
baransu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants