Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mDNS: restriction to a single interface #6224

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

d-a-v
Copy link
Collaborator

@d-a-v d-a-v commented Jun 24, 2019

Default interface is STA (or AP if available and STA is unavailable).
An interface can also be specified in ::begin() by its IP address.
MDNS will not cross interfaces (there is currently no notion of "bridged interfaces")

Multiple instances should be working, this is not tested in this commit.

Default interface is STA (or AP if available and STA is unavailable).
An interface can also be specified in ::begin() by its IP address.
MDNS will not cross interfaces (there is currently no notion of "bridged interfaces")

Multiple instances should be working, this is not tested in this commit.
@d-a-v
Copy link
Collaborator Author

d-a-v commented Jun 24, 2019

@LaborEtArs @hreintke

Should fix #5711

@d-a-v d-a-v merged commit f9009b8 into esp8266:master Jun 27, 2019
@Lan-Hekary
Copy link
Contributor

The Issue #5915 is resolved by this PR
Also .. this kinda of Eliminate the Solution in this PR #5894
but sadly .. the original issue in #5866 is Back ..
esp8266.local .. works only in WIFI_AP_STA mode or WIFI_STA mode ... But NOT in WIFI_AP mode ..

@ramiws
Copy link

ramiws commented May 23, 2020

Default interface is STA (or AP if available and STA is unavailable).
An interface can also be specified in ::begin() by its IP address.
MDNS will not cross interfaces (there is currently no notion of "bridged interfaces")

Multiple instances should be working, this is not tested in this commit.

Multiple instances are not working... so we end up with no way for AP and STA working at the same time.

@d-a-v
Copy link
Collaborator Author

d-a-v commented May 23, 2020

@ramiws check #7213

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants