Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bl0942: Add address and line_frequency options #4126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dwmw2
Copy link
Contributor

@dwmw2 dwmw2 commented Aug 12, 2024

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#7250

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook. (N/A)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the BL0942 sensor documentation by introducing two optional configuration variables: line_frequency and address. These additions improve user configurability, allowing for the specification of the AC line frequency (50Hz or 60Hz) and the sensor's address, defaulting to 50Hz and 0, respectively. This makes the setup process more precise and tailored to individual user requirements.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/sensor/bl0942.rst Added line_frequency (optional, string) and address (optional, int) variables for enhanced sensor configuration.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagrams are generated for this change as it does not involve modifications to control flow or complex interactions.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a262f31
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/66bf70c6c1d2400008e388e2
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4126--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@dwmw2 dwmw2 force-pushed the bl0942 branch 2 times, most recently from e569794 to 2b3c0e6 Compare August 16, 2024 15:00
@dwmw2 dwmw2 changed the base branch from current to next August 16, 2024 15:31
@probot-esphome probot-esphome bot added next and removed current labels Aug 16, 2024
@jesserockz jesserockz merged commit b500331 into esphome:next Aug 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants