Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update contributing.rst #4188

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

kbx81
Copy link
Member

@kbx81 kbx81 commented Aug 23, 2024

Description:

Various updates, particularly around PR submission. Lots of other tweaks & copy fixes/corrections.

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the contributing guidelines for the ESPHome project include enhancements to clarity and consistency. Changes encompass the use of more inclusive language, expanded instructions for documentation contributions, and clearer expectations for pull request submissions. The guidelines also outline standards for code quality and validation, ensuring that contributors have a comprehensive understanding of the process and requirements for successful participation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
guides/contributing.rst Enhanced and clarified contributing guidelines, including inclusive language, expanded documentation instructions, and detailed expectations for pull requests, code quality standards, and validation.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f23bfb and 6a2e65e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • guides/contributing.rst (18 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • guides/contributing.rst

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6a2e65e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/66cd36e37d8eec0007f5c00d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4188--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.


This method is also automatically loaded and invoked by the ESPHome core. An example of
such a method can be seen below:
This method is also automatically loaded and invoked by the ESPHome core. Here's an example of such a method:

.. code-block:: python
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we update this block to use async/await and also update the text below to remove all references to yield and use await.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See how this looks: 33d4838 (#4188)

guides/contributing.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 700 to 705
.. note::

**Code in** ``loop()``, ``update()`` **and** ``setup()`` **must not block**. Specifically, methods like ``delay()``
should be avoided and **delays longer than 10 ms are not permitted**. The reason for this is that ESPHome uses a
single-threaded loop for all components -- if your component blocks, it will delay the whole loop, negatively
impacting other components. This can result in a variety of problems such as network connections being lost.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe here give reference to this->set_timeout or using a state-machine to handle "waiting" in loop for the state to become what is needed for the next stage?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See how this looks: 33d4838 (#4188)

guides/contributing.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@esphome esphome bot marked this pull request as draft August 26, 2024 21:31
@esphome
Copy link

esphome bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

kbx81 and others added 4 commits August 26, 2024 17:53
Co-authored-by: Jesse Hills <3060199+jesserockz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jesse Hills <3060199+jesserockz@users.noreply.github.com>
@kbx81 kbx81 marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 00:43
@esphome esphome bot requested a review from jesserockz August 27, 2024 00:43
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 18

guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
guides/contributing.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Jesse Hills <3060199+jesserockz@users.noreply.github.com>
jesserockz
jesserockz previously approved these changes Aug 27, 2024
@jesserockz jesserockz merged commit b6cacbd into esphome:current Aug 27, 2024
2 checks passed
@@ -697,14 +747,28 @@ The next method that will be called with your component is ``loop()`` (or ``upda
:apiclass:`PollingComponent`). These methods should retrieve the latest data from your component and publish them with
the provided methods.

.. note::
Finally, your component must have a ``dump_config`` method that prints the complete user configuration.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when dump_config is an required method to be override. would it not good idea to change up the Component class by changing "Virtual dump_config() {}" into "Virtual dump_config() = 0;"?

@jesserockz jesserockz mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants