Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected incorrect descriptions #4348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

XMaarten
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed some small mistakes in the signed/unsigned descriptions

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4cbf4c7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/67118ef69fcfb6000800762c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4348--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The documentation for the modbus_controller platform has been updated to correct the descriptions of specific data types related to Modbus registers. The changes specifically address the value_type section, ensuring accurate descriptions for S_QWORD and U_QWORD_R data types.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/number/modbus_controller.rst Updated descriptions for S_QWORD and U_QWORD_R in the value_type section to clarify data types.

Suggested labels

has-parent

Suggested reviewers

  • jesserockz

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d55126 and 4cbf4c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/number/modbus_controller.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/number/modbus_controller.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/number/modbus_controller.rst (1)

23-23: LGTM: Correct description for S_QWORD

The change from "unsigned" to "signed" for the S_QWORD data type is correct. This accurately reflects that S_QWORD represents a signed 64-bit integer, which is consistent with the 'S' prefix typically used for 'Signed' data types.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nagyrobi nagyrobi merged commit 9782a52 into esphome:current Oct 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants