feat(webserver) Middleware with default middleware for cors, authc, curl-like logging

[mathieucarbou]

This PR improves WebServer with the following additions:

• Add Middleware support (aka Expressif) with some built-in middlewares like cors, authc and logging
• Add ability to collect all incoming request headers
• Added response code and info on server

As discussed in #10185, I tested the example thanks to a pio config.

Ideally it would be nice if @me-no-dev and @ayushsharma82 could review this PR, both were involved in these parts.

[github-actions]

Warnings

⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR: the commit message "feat: Middleware support for WebServer with default middlewares for cors, authc, curl-like logging": summary appears to be too long Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips: follow Conventional Commits style correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers) TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

👋 Hello mathieucarbou, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

---

Click to see more instructions ...

This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...

We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9617be6

[github-actions]

Test Results

 56 files   -  83   56 suites   - 83   4m 56s ⏱️ - 1h 38m 21s
 21 tests  -   9   21 ✅  -   9  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
135 runs   - 168  135 ✅  - 168  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9617be6. ± Comparison against base commit e70f4d3.

This pull request removes 9 tests.

performance.coremark.test_coremark ‑ test_coremark
performance.fibonacci.test_fibonacci ‑ test_fibonacci
performance.psramspeed.test_psramspeed ‑ test_psramspeed
performance.ramspeed.test_ramspeed ‑ test_ramspeed
performance.superpi.test_superpi ‑ test_superpi
test_touch_errors
test_touch_interrtupt
test_touch_read
validation.periman.test_periman ‑ test_periman

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)

The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.

Memory	FLASH [bytes]		FLASH [%]		RAM [bytes]		RAM [%]
Target	DEC	INC	DEC	INC	DEC	INC	DEC	INC
ESP32S3	💚 -51K	‼️ +76K	💚 -5.35	‼️ +8.50	💚 -4K	‼️ +9K	💚 -11.32	‼️ +20.10

Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]

Target	ESP32S3
Example	FLASH	RAM
WebServer/examples/AdvancedWebServer	‼️ +58K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/FSBrowser	‼️ +75K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/Filters	‼️ +5K	‼️ +5K
WebServer/examples/HelloServer	‼️ +5K	‼️ +5K
WebServer/examples/HttpAdvancedAuth	‼️ +6K	‼️ +5K
WebServer/examples/HttpAuthCallback	‼️ +6K	‼️ +5K
WebServer/examples/HttpAuthCallbackInline	‼️ +57K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/HttpBasicAuth	‼️ +57K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/HttpBasicAuthSHA1	‼️ +57K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/HttpBasicAuthSHA1orBearerToken	‼️ +57K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/Middleware	-	-
WebServer/examples/MultiHomedServers	‼️ +58K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/PathArgServer	‼️ +76K	‼️ +9K
WebServer/examples/SDWebServer	‼️ +59K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/SimpleAuthentification	‼️ +73K	‼️ +7K
WebServer/examples/UploadHugeFile	‼️ +59K	‼️ +8K
WebServer/examples/WebServer	‼️ +29K	‼️ +6K
WebServer/examples/WebUpdate	‼️ +5K	‼️ +5K

[Jason2866]

@mathieucarbou Do you see the possibility to make this enhancement optional?
The size increase is not just a few bytes.

[mathieucarbou]

@mathieucarbou Do you see the possibility to make this enhancement optional? The size increase is not just a few bytes.

I saw that and I was surprised by it... I don't feel to have written 2k of code...

[mathieucarbou]

Adding a ref to: #10221 (comment)