Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(sdmmc): Add RAW disk functions #9796

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lbernstone
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Change

Added SD_MMC.ReadRAW and SD_MMC.WriteRAW. Added example to demonstrate USBMSC accessing SDMMC card.

Tests scenarios

Tested on ESP32-S3 (the only supported platform ATM), v3.0.0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "Fixed sdmmc host check to pass CI":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

Messages
📖 You might consider squashing your 5 commits (simplifying branch history).

👋 Hello lbernstone, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- Addressing info messages (📖) is strongly recommended; they're less critical but valuable.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c92bd43

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Test Results

 56 files   56 suites   4m 17s ⏱️
 21 tests  21 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
135 runs  135 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit c92bd43.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)

The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.

MemoryFLASH [bytes]FLASH [%]RAM [bytes]RAM [%]
TargetDECINCDECINCDECINCDECINC
ESP32S3000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32000.000.00000.000.00
Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]
TargetESP32S3ESP32
ExampleFLASHRAMFLASHRAM
SD_MMC/examples/SD2USBMSC----
SD_MMC/examples/SDMMC_Test----
SD_MMC/examples/SDMMC_time----

feat(sdmmc): fixed printf mismatches and missing callback

feat(sdmmc): added ci.json

Removed excess log_i
Copy link
Collaborator

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz added Area: Libraries Issue is related to Library support. Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged labels Jun 6, 2024
@lbernstone
Copy link
Contributor Author

If someone has a S3 rig set up able to do 4-bit SDIO, I'd be interested to know what kind of transfer rate you can get vs 1-bit.

@lbernstone lbernstone requested a review from me-no-dev June 7, 2024 21:58
@me-no-dev me-no-dev merged commit e382746 into espressif:master Jun 12, 2024
41 checks passed
Jason2866 added a commit to tasmota/arduino-esp32 that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
* feat(sdmmc): Add RAW disk functions

feat(sdmmc): fixed printf mismatches and missing callback

feat(sdmmc): added ci.json

Removed excess log_i

* ci(pre-commit): Apply automatic fixes

* Fixed sdmmc host check to pass CI

* feat(sdmmc): fixed example USB check

---------

Co-authored-by: lbernstone <lbernstone@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci-lite[bot] <117423508+pre-commit-ci-lite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Saavedra Vaz <32426024+lucasssvaz@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Libraries Issue is related to Library support. Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants