Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Update the root certificate for the BasicHttpsClient example #9857

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

a-grealish
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Change

The example code was failing with a connection refused error. The hard-coded root certificate was not the one I found on the example URL. I've updated to the new certificate.

Tests scenarios

I've tested on a ESP32-S3-DevKitC-1 module.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 13, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Messages
📖 You might consider squashing your 3 commits (simplifying branch history).

👋 Hello a-grealish, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Addressing info messages (📖) is strongly recommended; they're less critical but valuable.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against fab6dc8

@a-grealish a-grealish force-pushed the bugfix/basic_http_client_cert branch from c4195f2 to 1069e15 Compare June 13, 2024 12:44
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Test Results

 56 files   56 suites   5m 16s ⏱️
 21 tests  21 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
135 runs  135 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit fab6dc8.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@VojtechBartoska VojtechBartoska added Type: Example Issue is related to specific example. Status: Review needed Issue or PR is awaiting review labels Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)

The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.

MemoryFLASH [bytes]FLASH [%]RAM [bytes]RAM [%]
TargetDECINCDECINCDECINCDECINC
ESP32S3000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32S2000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32C3000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32C6000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32000.000.00000.000.00
Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]
TargetESP32S3ESP32S2ESP32C3ESP32C6ESP32
ExampleFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAM
HTTPClient/examples/BasicHttpsClient----------

@a-grealish a-grealish changed the title Update the root certificate for the BasicHttpsClient example fix: Update the root certificate for the BasicHttpsClient example Jun 13, 2024
@SuGlider SuGlider self-requested a review June 17, 2024 19:49
@SuGlider
Copy link
Collaborator

The certification issue in the example BasicHttpsClient.ino is fixed by this PR.
Thanks @a-grealish, for the fix!

@me-no-dev - Please Merge it.

@me-no-dev me-no-dev added Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged and removed Status: Review needed Issue or PR is awaiting review labels Jun 18, 2024
@me-no-dev me-no-dev merged commit 76b6ff6 into espressif:master Jun 18, 2024
61 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged Type: Example Issue is related to specific example.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants