Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Identify (and resolve) missing coverage for ELC #2685

Closed
RudolfWeeber opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3123
Closed

Identify (and resolve) missing coverage for ELC #2685

RudolfWeeber opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3123
Assignees
@reinaual
Milestone
Espresso 4.1

Comments

@RudolfWeeber
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@RudolfWeeber RudolfWeeber added this to the Espresso 4.1 milestone Apr 9, 2019
@fweik
Copy link
Contributor

fweik commented Apr 10, 2019

See coverage report. The misses mostly seem related to the space_layer parameter.

@KonradBreitsprecher
Copy link
Contributor

Should be covered by an additional test with particles more close to the boundaries.
I'm a bit afraid but will try..

@reinaual reinaual mentioned this issue Apr 30, 2019
Closed
@RudolfWeeber
Copy link
Contributor Author

@reinaual, what is the status here?

@reinaual reinaual mentioned this issue Sep 5, 2019
Merged
@bors bors bot closed this as completed in 6c7bc5a Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@reinaual reinaual

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Espresso 4.1
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

ELC Coverage, integer flags converted reinaual/espresso
4 participants
@RudolfWeeber @fweik @KonradBreitsprecher @reinaual