-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement: filter by record type (not content folder) in Dashboard Content View #749
Labels
Comments
Thanks, @pauko, for the suggestion. An implementation where you can define your filter options is coming. There will be a new setting introduced: {
"frontMatter.content.filters": [
"pageFolders",
"tags",
"categories",
{
"title": "Type",
"name": "type"
},
"otherValue"
]
} As you can see in the above code, you can define your filters as a |
Feel free to give it a try in the beta and provide feedback if needed. |
estruyf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 22, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
Project: 10.0.0
Status: Done
and removed
Status: In progress
labels
Feb 22, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As you introduced support for sub-content on behalf of #722 and #715, I organize my (single) content folder as illustrated in the diagram in #715.
At the moment I can't filter for a specific record type in the Content View of the Dashboard, e.g., in above example, I can't filter all
problem
records across all sub-content directories.Describe the solution you'd like
The Content View of the Dashboard should allow to filter by the
type
metadata field of each record.In combination with Enhancement: support custom taxonomies as filter in Content view #744, cascades of filters should be supported, for instance, I can filter by some custom taxonomy and then show specific record
type
s of some value of the custom taxonomy. In above example this means, I can filter allproblem
records (bytype
) ofSolution A
(by custom taxonomy).Describe alternatives you've considered
As I don't associate each record type with a dedicated content folder, the existing filtering by content folders is too coarse for this use case.
Additional context
Already mentioned in above sections.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: