Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backend: Remove logger nil checks #19077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

srujangit123
Copy link
Contributor

@srujangit123 srujangit123 commented Dec 16, 2024

To remove the ugly nil checks by instantiating the logger with a no-op logger if it is nil.

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

Fixes #19015

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @srujangit123. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 16, 2024

Please add an assert at the first line of (b *backend) defrag(), something like below,

verify.Assert(lg != nil, "the logger should not be nil")

@srujangit123 srujangit123 marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 04:26
@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Dec 17, 2024

/retitle backend: Remove logger nil checks

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title backend: Remove ugly nil checks backend: Remove logger nil checks Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.95652% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.76%. Comparing base (e0bbea9) to head (5398519).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
server/storage/backend/backend.go 86.95% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
server/storage/backend/backend.go 80.11% <86.95%> (-0.54%) ⬇️

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.72%   68.76%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35627    35641      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        24483    24508      +25     
+ Misses       9713     9706       -7     
+ Partials     1431     1427       -4     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e0bbea9...5398519. Read the comment docs.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 17, 2024

/ok-to-test

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 17, 2024

/retest

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 17, 2024

cc @fuweid @ivanvc @jmhbnz @serathius

Copy link
Member

@ahrtr ahrtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To remove the ugly nil checks by instantiating the logger with a no-op logger if it is nil.

Signed-off-by: Srujan Bharadwaj <srujanbharadwaj44@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@ivanvc ivanvc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks, @srujangit123.

@ivanvc ivanvc requested a review from fuweid December 19, 2024 06:47
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, ivanvc, serathius, srujangit123

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@serathius serathius merged commit e4d1da7 into etcd-io:main Dec 19, 2024
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Possible missing nil checks
6 participants