Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Native account abstraction rev 1 #2

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

forshtat
Copy link

@forshtat forshtat commented Oct 6, 2023

When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md

We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met:

  • The PR edits only existing draft PRs.
  • The build passes.
  • Your GitHub username or email address is listed in the 'author' header of all affected PRs, inside .
  • If matching on email address, the email address is the one publicly listed on your GitHub profile.

Copy link

@yoavw yoavw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only wrote one comment inside. And the diagrams are a great addition.

However, it seems to still be missing some of the things that came up in comments on PR #1. E.g. callGasLimit - calldataCost (unless you think it's wrong). Let's make sure we covered all of them.

EIPS/eip-00.md Outdated

Here is a visual representation of a block that contains multiple Account Abstraction Transactions.
The validation parts of AA transactions are executed in a separate position in a block, but are not considered
to be separate a transaction:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be clearer if we write "The validation parts of AA transactions are executed as separate transactions, but are not represented as separate transactions in the block data." ?

Also, rephrase the validation phase description.
@forshtat forshtat marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2023 14:04
@forshtat forshtat merged commit c87005b into native_account_abstraction Oct 10, 2023
7 of 13 checks passed
@forshtat forshtat deleted the native_account_abstraction_rev_1 branch October 10, 2023 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants