Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-1191: extends EIP-55 by optionally adding a chain id defined by EIP-155 to the checksum calculation #1191

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

juli
Copy link
Contributor

@juli juli commented Jul 2, 2018

No description provided.

EIPS/eip-1186.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
---
eip: 1186
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this numbered 1186?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tell me what number to use. 1191?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, 1191 is fine.

@juli juli changed the title Adds an EIP to define how to add chain id of new networks to address checksums EIP-1191: extends EIP-55 by optionally adding a chain id defined by EIP-155 to the checksum calculation Jul 9, 2018
@Arachnid Arachnid merged commit a9794af into ethereum:master Jul 11, 2018
Arachnid pushed a commit to Arachnid/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2018
…IP-155 to the checksum calculation (ethereum#1191)

* EIP Add chain id to mixed-case checksum address encoding

* Fixes header

* Update eip-1186.md

* Change assigned EIP number
@axic
Copy link
Member

axic commented May 23, 2019

@juli this EIP doesn't have a copyright statement. Can you please add one? EIP-1 suggests CC0 - see the eip-x.md template.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants