Update EIP-1: Remove requires header

[Pandapip1]

Removes the requires header in favor of it being automatically parsed from the links.

[eth-bot]

File EIPS/eip-1.md

Requires 2 more reviewers from @axic, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

[SamWilsn]

How would you feel about dropping the requires header entirely, treating all links as normative, and generating a machine readable bibliography while rendering from the markdown representations we allow?

[Pandapip1]

How would you feel about dropping the requires header entirely, treating all links as normative, and generating a machine readable bibliography while rendering from the markdown representations we allow?

So basically remove the requires header and automatically cite all references?

[SamWilsn]

So basically remove the requires header and automatically cite all references?

Yes, exactly. Parse the shorthands defined in EIP-1 from the proposal being rendered and generate a true bibliography.

[SamWilsn]

👍 from me! I'll put it on the agenda for next EIPIP.

[SamWilsn]

From @xinbenlv, roughly:

Generating the bibliography isn't blocked on removing the requires: header, and there isn't enough justification to remove the header at this time.

[Pandapip1]

Would there be any justification from keeping the header? I would be okay with grandfathering old EIPs.

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

[github-actions]

This pull request was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback or request a review in a comment.

[Scamreno]

#7478

[Scamreno]

#7478

[Scamreno]

I just hope this finally be resolved

[Scamreno]

-1.md