Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-1: Allow links to portal-network-specs #8634

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

KolbyML
Copy link
Member

@KolbyML KolbyML commented Jun 7, 2024

This PR updates the config to support links to the portal-network-specs.

The portal-network-specs repo outlines specifications for light protocol access for the execution layer and gradually the consensus layer as well.

@KolbyML KolbyML requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner June 7, 2024 18:47
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal t-process labels Jun 7, 2024
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Jun 7, 2024

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus label Jun 7, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Config: Allow links to portal-network-specs Update EIP-1: Allow links to portal-network-specs Jun 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@g11tech g11tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) July 3, 2024 17:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@eth-bot eth-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit 9438d3e into ethereum:master Jul 3, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-update Modifies an existing proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus t-process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants