Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ERC: Structured Data Clear Signing Format #509

Open
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lcastillo-ledger
Copy link

This is Ledger's proposal for a format enabling smartcontract developers to define the intended UI on wallets when signing a transaction or an EIP 712 message intended for the contract.

For more context, you can refer to this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O7aX6vUvs8

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Jun 26, 2024

File ERCS/erc-7730.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Ledger's Clear Signing format request for comments Add ERC: Structured Data Clear Signing Format Jun 26, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Jun 26, 2024
ERCS/erc-xxx.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-xxx.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lcastillo-ledger and others added 3 commits June 28, 2024 09:28
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@usame-algan
Copy link
Contributor

Is it in the scope of this EIP on how to handle off-chain data? e.g. some swap transactions merely contain a reference (orderId) to the actual data. So an intent that is purely based on the transaction data might not give the user enough information whereas if the dApp knew what to do with the orderId, more information like the amount or tokens involved in the swap could be displayed.

lcastillo-ledger and others added 3 commits September 1, 2024 18:21
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Sep 1, 2024
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
lcastillo-ledger and others added 5 commits September 1, 2024 18:21
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Usame Algan <5880855+usame-algan@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Sep 1, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fixed your preamble. Please take a look at the errors generated by eipw. They'll need to be fixed before merging.

ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-7730.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-ci labels Sep 15, 2024
Copy link

The commit c691eef (as a parent of 6d2c71c) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Sep 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Sep 15, 2024
@lcastillo-ledger
Copy link
Author

I updated to take all reviewers comments into account and pass the linter checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants