-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
go.mod: Go 1.16 #22462
go.mod: Go 1.16 #22462
Conversation
Date: 2021-03-08 08:48:29-06:00 Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Date: 2021-03-08 08:49:18-06:00 Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
I have been doing a little research (timely, I know) on how exactly the Go version number is supposed to be used. In short,
(a caveat):
"It implies to me the minimum version of Go for the project". Following this logic, then it seems like Now, I'm not sure if the Go vulnerability fixed with
Note that setting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me ... @fjl?
I'm not sure about this. |
We really don't see any reason to start playing with whatever language syntax enforcement this field provides. If you can build it with old versions, great. If we'll use something newer and old builds fail, you're gonna see it. |
Bump module Go version from 1.13 (released 2019/09/03) to 1.16 (released 2021/02/16).
CI builder versions were bumped to 1.16 with c5023e1.