Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core/types: sanity check the basefee length inside a header #23171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2021

Conversation

karalabe
Copy link
Member

@karalabe karalabe commented Jul 6, 2021

EIP 1559 added a new unbounded type to the headers (base fee). This PR adds a meaningful can on top of it to prevent anyone from finding an ingenious way to do an amplification attack with junk basefees (with valid PoW).

@karalabe karalabe added this to the 1.10.5 milestone Jul 6, 2021
@karalabe karalabe requested a review from holiman July 6, 2021 09:40
Copy link
Member

@MariusVanDerWijden MariusVanDerWijden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@holiman holiman merged commit e13d14e into ethereum:master Jul 6, 2021
@tayvano
Copy link

tayvano commented Jul 7, 2021

Are there any sanity checks around the max value of the tip akin to the old 500 gwei gasprice fat finger cap?

@karalabe
Copy link
Member Author

karalabe commented Jul 7, 2021

@tayvano Yes, the new tip estimator uses the exact same code as the old gas price estimator (just slightly modified to return a number without the base fee): https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/master/eth/gasprice/gasprice.go#L184

sidhujag pushed a commit to sidhujag/go-ethereum that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2021
atif-konasl pushed a commit to frozeman/pandora-execution-engine that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants