ethdb/pebble: sync pebble writes #27522
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is likely the culprit behind several data corruption issues, e.g. where data has been written to the freezer, but the deletion from leveldb does not go through due to process crash.
Pebble has pretty strange sync options:
sync=true
: writes to the WAL are flushed to OS, and fsync:ed to disk.sync=false
: writes to the WAL are in-mem, and flushed to OS at some future time.Out of durability guarantees,
With leveldb, we could choose to land on
2
: survive process crash, but potentially corrupt data on os crash. With pebble, it's either option1
or3
. Current master uses3
.This PR uses option
1
.Benchmarking, this PR is on
07
, master on08
: