-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 326
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Execution Layer Meeting 155 #720
Comments
For Cancun: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6465 (separate from 6404 transactions/receipts) |
@etan-status should we also add this to the SSZ breakout? |
Vitalik's post and EIP-6404 should be enough for the SSZ breakout. The primary discussion point to address is about the ossification of common transaction fields vs the unrestricted Have split EIP-6466 (Receipts) and EIP-6465 (Withdrawals) from EIP-6404, and will update them according to the SSZ breakout discussion as well. For the next ACDE (this GH issue), EIP-6465 should be discussed for inclusion in Cancun. Execution clients will require SSZ support for EIP-4844 anyway, so Cancun seems to be a good target to get withdrawals migrated. |
I'd like a few minutes to discuss and get feedback on this PR to standardize the txpool API |
Would like to discuss the upcoming status of the |
We also discussed selfdestruct removal on the call. |
Closed in favour of #729 |
Meeting Info
#allcoredevs
Discord channel shortly before the callAgenda
minimal
presets (context)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: