Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Meeting 58.md #91

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2019
Merged

Create Meeting 58.md #91

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2019

Conversation

DBrettRobertson
Copy link
Contributor

Please review and if appropriate add to the PM Notes.

Copy link
Contributor

@timbeiko timbeiko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the Actions & Summary. Added a few links that may provide more context. Not all of it happened during the call, but it may help direct people to where the conversation is currently happening.

All Core Devs Meetings/Meeting 58.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

### DECISIONS MADE

**DECISION 58.1** The [ProgPoW Carbon Vote](http://www.progpowcarbonvote.com/) signal will be shutting down in 13 days from today. Everyone that wishes to vote will need to do so before this date and ensure they leave their ETH in the address they voted from until after the specified block number.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This wasn't in the call, but Lane has since then defined the block number. May be worth including: https://twitter.com/lrettig/status/1111652965331415040

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call - updated.

All Core Devs Meetings/Meeting 58.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

**ACTION 58.2** Review the proposed solutions for Roadmaps in the [Ethereum Magicians](https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/more-frequent-smaller-hardforks-vs-less-frequent-larger-ones/2929) forum to decide if going forward the Core Devs adopts smaller hardforks rather than larger hardforks.

**ACTION 58.3** Vitalik to format the currently proposed EIP-1559 so that it is correctly presented.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps link it? ethereum/EIPs#1559

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.


**ACTION 58.4** Lane to provide a block number for when the [ProgPoW Carbon Vote](http://www.progpowcarbonvote.com/) will be shutdown.

**ACTION 58.5** Discuss if ProgPoW should continue to be implemented if the Technical Audit is not funded in [Ethereum Magicians](https://ethereum-magicians.org/tags/progpow) or [here](https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/what-has-to-be-done-to-get-progpow-on-ethereum/1361) or [here](https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/motion-to-not-include-progpow-without-audit/3027).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A lot of conversation has happened here, may be worth linking too: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/motion-to-not-include-progpow-without-audit/3027

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Already in the list of links.


**ACTION 58.6** Clients should provide updates for future Core Dev Calls in the comments of the agenda and request an update to the agenda if they wish to discuss anything specific.

**ACTION 58.7** Research should provide updates for future Core Dev Calls in the comments of the agenda and request an update to the agenda if they wish to discuss anything specific.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: This and the one above are duplicated in the "Decisions" section above.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, there is an element of duplication but one was a decision regarding no longer having generic updates in the meeting and the other is to direct the Clients and Researchers to start providing updates in the comments of the agenda.

All Core Devs Meetings/Meeting 58.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DBrettRobertson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @timbeiko for the review and updates.

@lrettig lrettig merged commit 4c19795 into ethereum:master Mar 31, 2019
@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants