[Fix] Switching Between Team and Employee in Approval Causes Selected Team/Employee to Be Lost #8450
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces formatting changes to the HTML template of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.ts (1)
264-275: Excellent implementation ofsetParticipantsValuesmethod.This new method effectively addresses the core issue of losing selected team/employee when switching between them. It ensures that only one type of participant is set in the form at a time, clearing the other type.
For added robustness, consider adding an else clause to handle unexpected
participantsvalues:setParticipantsValues() { if (this.participants === 'employees') { this.form.get('employees').setValue(this.selectedEmployees); this.form.get('teams').setValue([]); } else if (this.participants === 'teams') { this.form.get('teams').setValue(this.selectedTeams); this.form.get('employees').setValue([]); } else { console.warn(`Unexpected participants value: ${this.participants}`); // Optionally, set both to empty arrays or handle as appropriate } }This change would make the method more defensive against potential bugs or future modifications.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.html (5 hunks)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.ts (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.html
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.ts
[error] 223-223: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/approvals/approvals-mutation.component.ts (4)
220-221: Excellent addition to ensure correct participant selection.The call to
this.setParticipantsValues()before form submission is a crucial fix that addresses the issue of losing selected team/employee when switching between them. This ensures that the correct participants are always set in the form before submission.
225-225: Improved code readability.The addition of this empty line enhances the visual separation between different logical sections of the
onSubmitmethod, making the code more readable.
Line range hint
1-275: Summary: Approved changes addressing the core issue.The changes in this file effectively solve the problem of losing selected team/employee when switching between them in the approval process. The new
setParticipantsValuesmethod, along with its strategic placement in theonSubmitmethod, ensures that the correct participants are always set in the form before submission.The code is well-structured, properly commented, and the changes are focused on addressing the specific issue without introducing unnecessary complexity. The minor suggestions provided in the review comments are for further optimization and robustness, but the current implementation is sound and achieves the intended goal.
Overall, these changes significantly improve the user experience and data integrity in the approval selection process. Great work!
223-223: Consider performance impact of delete operator.The static analysis tool flagged the use of the
deleteoperator here as a potential performance issue. While generally good advice, in this specific case, the performance impact is likely negligible as this operation occurs only once during form submission.If you decide to address this, consider the following alternatives:
- Use undefined assignment:
this.form.value['id'] = undefined;- Use object destructuring to create a new object without the 'id' property.
However, be cautious about changing this without understanding if any other part of the codebase expects the 'id' property to be absent rather than undefined. The current implementation might be intentional for compatibility reasons.
To help decide if a change is necessary, you can run the following script to check for other uses of
deletein form submissions:This will help identify if this pattern is used consistently across the codebase, which might indicate a deliberate choice rather than an oversight.
✅ Verification successful
Usage of the
deleteoperator is acceptable.The
deleteoperator is used in two files to remove the'id'property fromthis.form.value. Since these operations occur only during form submissions and are not within performance-critical sections, the impact is negligible.No changes are necessary unless there's a specific requirement to standardize this pattern across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of delete operator used in form submissions rg --type typescript 'delete.*form.*value' -g '!*test*'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of delete operator used in form submissions rg 'delete\s+this\.form\.value' --type ts --glob '!*.test.ts' --glob '!*.test.tsx'Length of output: 298
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 223-223: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 7d6cc97. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution
✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes