Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More clarity needed for allow/deny once/all #5

Closed
ckuethe opened this issue Apr 18, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

More clarity needed for allow/deny once/all #5

ckuethe opened this issue Apr 18, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@ckuethe
Copy link
Contributor

ckuethe commented Apr 18, 2017

Experimentally it seems to mean "$ACTION just this connection" or "... every connection" from this process. There could be some middle ground, eg. always allowing port 53 to my expected DNS resolvers while still requiring intervention for other connections.

@evilsocket
Copy link
Owner

yeah i need to implement a better rule handling/policy

@0xacb 0xacb mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2017
gustavo-iniguez-goya added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2020
We parse .desktop files to get the icon of a program, but sometimes we
can't parse the Name translation due to unicode encoding problems.

Besides, on some distributions there're .desktop files without Exec=
line, so we also crash.

With this workaround we miss (mainly) the icon of a program, but at
least we won't crash.

It should help with #5.
gustavo-iniguez-goya added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2020
When a new connection is about to be established and the system performs
a dns resolution, we displayed it like this: 9.9.9.9 (www.opensnitch.io)

It added visibility of what was going on, but if you created a rule to
filter by destination host, you were prompted twice to allow firstly the
DNS query, and secondly the TCP connection, which was a bit annoying.

Some users (#5) also asked to display just the domain, so now we only
display the domain name.
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants