Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(esl-utils): add parseTime, less restrictive alternative to passed time format #2573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

ala-n
Copy link
Collaborator

@ala-n ala-n commented Aug 7, 2024

No description provided.

@ala-n ala-n added the enhancement Improvements and additions to code label Aug 7, 2024
@ala-n ala-n added this to the ⚡ESL: 5.0.0 Major release milestone Aug 7, 2024
@ala-n ala-n requested review from a team August 7, 2024 15:28
@ala-n ala-n self-assigned this Aug 7, 2024
@ala-n ala-n requested review from dshovchko, yadamskaya and abarmina and removed request for a team August 7, 2024 15:28
@ala-n ala-n added the needs review The PR is waiting for review label Aug 7, 2024
src/modules/esl-utils/misc/format.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/modules/esl-utils/misc/format.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ala-n ala-n changed the title feat(esl-utils): make parseCSSTime less restrictive to passed format feat(esl-utils): add parseTime, less restrictive alternative to passed time format Aug 9, 2024
@ala-n ala-n merged commit d52213c into main-beta Aug 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@ala-n ala-n deleted the feat/time-parsing branch August 11, 2024 18:36
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2024
@ala-n
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ala-n commented Aug 13, 2024

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.0.0-beta.31 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Improvements and additions to code needs review The PR is waiting for review released on @beta
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants