Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ Drop sphinx 4 support, add sphinx 6 #664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 89.94% // Head: 89.94% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (fe2b612) compared to base (bf56662).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #664   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.94%   89.94%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        2396     2396           
=======================================
  Hits         2155     2155           
  Misses        241      241           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 89.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@lorengordon
Copy link

Any plans to create a new release that includes this support?

@RCheesley
Copy link

@chrisjsewell will there be a release at some point soon? It's blocking us from updating several dependencies at the moment. I checked the milestones but it looks a little out of date, so would be super helpful to know if you're maybe working to a timeline for the next release?

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member Author

Any plans to create a new release that includes this support?

Nearly there, should be just: #695 and #696

@RCheesley
Copy link

That's great, anything we can do to help get them over the line?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sphinx 6 support
3 participants